8D-Berichtersteller
BearbeitenComplete each discipline, then Done to return to the read-only report.
Symptom, urgency, scope, and how you will run the 8D (resources, milestones).
One row per person. Role examples: Champion, Core team, SME, Customer liaison.
| # | Member | Role | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Facts: what, where, when, how many, IS / IS NOT. Quantify the gap vs requirement.
Table of containment tasks; add rows as needed.
| # | Action | Owner | Due | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Use the sections below instead of one long paragraph.
Methods used: 5 Whys, fishbone, comparative tests, data review, etc.
State the cause(s) supported by evidence — not guesses.
Where the defect escaped the process and which controls failed or were absent.
How you proved this cause (trial, demonstration, data).
Permanent actions table; validation narrative below.
| # | Action | Owner | Due | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Deployment, training, tracking dates, and evidence the problem stays solved.
Update standards, FMEA/control plan, audits, systemic fixes across similar lines/sites.
What went well, lessons learned, recognition, and closure of the case.
Dieser Bericht ist ein Einzelsitzungs-Snapshot. Kanrix verfolgt offene Disziplinen, Eskalationsstatus und Lessons Learned im gesamten Team.
Book an Execution Gap Review →